![]() |
That didn't take long....
Quote:
http://change.gov/agenda/urbanpolicy/ |
Re: That didn't take long....
A sign of the new social, economic and cultural model based on England and Zimbabwe. Coming soon to your town! I'm so depressed. CHANGE AND HOPE or was it HOPE AND CHANGE.
Take care, Mod1 |
Re: That didn't take long....
It is amazing how FAST his followers have flipped and now are saying banning guns is okay....
Of course the election is over now. |
Re: That didn't take long....
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Todd_Tiahrt
Tiahrt is the author of the Tiahrt Amendment, which prohibits the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE) from releasing information from its firearms trace database to anyone other than a law enforcement agency or prosecutor in connection with a criminal investigation. Additionally, any data so released is inadmissible in a civil lawsuit.[5] Some groups, including the Mayors Against Illegal Guns Coalition, believe that having further access to the BATFE database would help municipal police departments track down sellers of illegal guns and curb crime. These groups are trying to undo the Tiahrt Amendment.[6] |
Re: That didn't take long....
What is the gunshow loophole? Does that mean that you can buy a gun from a non-licensed dealer at a show without the background check and waiting period and all that jazz?
|
Re: That didn't take long....
Quote:
is a term coined to describe the legal sale of firearms between private individuals at gun shows in states where this is legal. When these sales take place at a gun show, some perceive a "loophole" in the National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS), although these laws have never applied to individual-to-individual sales of personal firearms. United States federal law requires persons engaged in interstate firearm commerce, or who are in the business of selling firearms, to hold a Federal Firearms License and to perform checks prior to transferring a firearm, but there is an exemption for private sales by individuals who are "not engaged in the business" of selling firearms, or who only make "occasional" sales. Unlicensed private sellers are permitted by law to sell privately-owned guns at gun shows, or at private locations, in 24 states (as of 1998).[10] Although gun shows remain a point of concern, a 1997 Department of Justice survey of 3,959 inmates found that only 2% stated that they had bought a gun used in a crime from a gun show.[11] The remaining 98% were obtained from other sources, in which the criminal had no direct connection with a gun show. The most common sources (35%) were family or friends.[12] |
Re: That didn't take long....
No-one knows what the gunshow loophole really is....
It would most likely be to ban private sales anywhere,otherwise people would simply agree to buy firearms outside the gunshow. |
Re: That didn't take long....
Quote:
At the risk of sounding Mogambo-ish, I guess I was the only one who remembered BJ Clinton's moderate stance during the campaign, and then the hard left turn on gun control after the 1992 election. My friends, I truly believe that in terms of engaging in evil, conniving treachery against others in pursuit of power and self-servitude, Obama and his cronies are going to make Bill and Hillary look like the Pope and Mother Teresa. |
Re: That didn't take long....
Sometimes the thought of armed conflict breaking out here doesn't sound too bad....
|
Re: That didn't take long....
oh boy....
Quote:
|
Re: That didn't take long....
Quote:
Quote:
There goes my plan of buying that AK-47 for my son for Christmas! He was already looking forward to showing it to his classmates! Wait...I still might have a few more months! |
Re: That didn't take long....
1 Attachment(s)
MOLON LABE.............@$$HOLES! |
Re: That didn't take long....
You can already see the sheep bowing down to Lord Obama. Including many here on this site. They will back the gun confiscations for the 'better good". After all Obama isn't Bush, he is a new kind of leader, the world somehow changed when Obama was elected. If Lord Obama tell us the evil guns must be confiscated it must be true.
|
Re: That didn't take long....
Quote:
|
Re: That didn't take long....
Quote:
All the way up to the election it was "No,there will be NO gun bans" even when shown Obamas record and beliefs. Now he is elected,it is what do you need those types of guns(none can define what an 'assault weapon' is of course) for anyway. And the gov. database,well if oyu have nothing to hide, you have nothing to fear.:36_1_28: |
Re: That didn't take long....
I knew anti gun legislation would be high on their agenda list.
|
Re: That didn't take long....
Under HR 1022,the following would be banned:
AK, AKM, AKS, AK-47, AK-74, ARM, MAK90, Misr, NHM 90, NHM 91, SA 85, SA 93, VEPR; `(ii) AR-10; `(iii) AR-15, Bushmaster XM15, Armalite M15, or Olympic Arms PCR; `(iv) AR70; `(v) Calico Liberty; `(vi) Dragunov SVD Sniper Rifle or Dragunov SVU; `(vii) Fabrique National FN/FAL, FN/LAR, or FNC; `(viii) Hi-Point Carbine; `(ix) HK-91, HK-93, HK-94, or HK-PSG-1; `(x) Kel-Tec Sub Rifle; `(xi) M1 Carbine; `(xii) Saiga; `(xiii) SAR-8, SAR-4800; `(xiv) SKS with detachable magazine; `(xv) SLG 95; `(xvi) SLR 95 or 96; `(xvii) Steyr AUG; `(xviii) Sturm, Ruger Mini-14; `(xix) Tavor; `(xx) Thompson 1927, Thompson M1, or Thompson 1927 Commando; or `(xxi) Uzi, Galil and Uzi Sporter, Galil Sporter, or Galil Sniper Rifle (Galatz). `(B) The following pistols or copies or duplicates thereof:
`(ii) Clause (i) shall not apply to an attached tubular device designed to accept, and capable of operating only with, .22 caliber rimfire ammunition. `(F) A semiautomatic pistol that has the ability to accept a detachable magazine, and has--
`(H) A semiautomatic shotgun that has--
`(J) A frame or receiver that is identical to, or based substantially on the frame or receiver of, a firearm described in any of subparagraphs (A) through (I) or (L). `(K) A conversion kit. `(L) A semiautomatic rifle or shotgun originally designed for military or law enforcement use, or a firearm based on the design of such a firearm, that is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, as determined by the Attorney General. In making the determination, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that a firearm procured for use by the United States military or any Federal law enforcement agency is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, and a firearm shall not be determined to be particularly suitable for sporting purposes solely because the firearm is suitable for use in a sporting event.'. |
Re: That didn't take long....
Quote:
Thats about the best example of double speak right there. If the police already have access to the BATFEs database...One would have to pose the question why does the MAIGC really want to repeal the amendment other than for malicious purposes such as civil personal lawsuits and weapon confiscation? |
Re: That didn't take long....
Quote:
Suckers! T |
Re: That didn't take long....
Quote:
HEY! http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_i1ZjNkR4id...tless72119.jpg Look around http://communitiesonline.homestead.c...es/troll_2.jpg That shit really doesn't fly here. |
Re: That didn't take long....
Look at the bottom paragraph....
Quote:
|
Re: That didn't take long....
Quote:
Pretty much covers anything we'd ever want huh. |
Re: That didn't take long....
Anyone care to bet that the new AG will be totally 110% anti?
|
Re: That didn't take long....
5 Attachment(s)
Dragunov SVD Sniper Rifle or Dragunov SVU........... those are some sweet rifels If I had the time they would have been on my hit list as well.
|
Re: That didn't take long....
O-MG! That folding stock Dragunov is sweet!
|
Re: That didn't take long....
Quote:
http://www.armytimes.com/news/2008/0...eland_090708w/ |
Re: That didn't take long....
L) A semiautomatic rifle or shotgun originally designed for military or law enforcement use, or a firearm based on the design of such a firearm, that is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, as determined by the Attorney General. In making the determination, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that a firearm procured for use by the United States military or any Federal law enforcement agency is not particularly suitable for sporting purposes, and a firearm shall not be determined to be particularly suitable for sporting purposes solely because the firearm is suitable for use in a sporting event.'.
---------------------------------------------------------------- So the 2nd ammendment guarantees our right to keep and bear arms for sporting purposes? So the founders wanted to protect quail hunting and target practice???? That was mighty nice of them to be so concerned about us... but what about fishing poles, the founding fathers didn't care enough to secure our rights to fish for sporting purposes???? |
Re: That didn't take long....
If anyone is interested,there is a VERY illuminating debate going on here:
http://www.city-data.com/forum/2008-...-gun-bans.html It started out pretty normally but has now gotten to the stage where the Obamatrons are basically saying too bad,we don't care what you want or what the 2nd Amendment states.... |
Re: That didn't take long....
Quote:
|
Re: That didn't take long....
Quote:
I am not sure we will not see a dictatorship of sorts in the next few years. |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:19 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright = None use it and Link to GIM